|
Mast cell tumors
(MCTs) are common in dogs, representing 16-21% of all canine
skin tumors. These tumors can occur in any breed, but tend to be
seen most often in Boxers, Boston Terriers, and Bulldogs.
Approximately 50% of cutaneous MCTs are found on the trunk and
perineal region, approximately 40% on the extremities, and about
10% arise from sites on the head and neck. Mast cell tumors are
often called the “great imitators” as they can have many
different clinical appearances and often look like cysts, fatty
tumors, or other common benign skin and subcutaneous lesions.
We commonly see patients with aggressive mast cell tumors that
had previously been “watched” for extended periods of time due
to their lipoma-like appearance.
Well
differentiated MCT of the medial thigh has the “classic”
appearance of a cutaneous, hairless, raised lesion.
How is the diagnosis made? A tentative diagnosis is usually made based on cytology from a
fine needle aspirate (FNA) of a mass. Once a tentative
diagnosis of a MCT is made with FNA, a biopsy needs to be
performed. If it appears that the location and size of the
tumor are amenable to complete surgical excision (i.e. 3 cm
gross margins laterally and one fascial plane deep), then
surgery should be done. However, if there is concern that it
would be difficult to obtain tumor free margins based on the
location of the tumor, then an incisional biopsy needs to be
performed.
What does the histologic grade mean? Histopathology (biopsy evaluation) is essential for establishing
a “grade”. A grade (1-3) is assigned to a patient’s tumor based
on criteria the pathologist uses to determine how aggressive the
tumor appears under the microscope.
Previously, the histologic grade was the main
criteria we used in predicting a patient’s prognosis; however it
is not always accurate in predicting the outcome of an
individual patient’s case. Approximately 75% of all canine MCTs
fall into the category of grade II tumors. The biologic
behavior of tumors in this large group (Grade II) is noted to be
extremely variable. For this reason, in addition to histologic
grading, we also perform “mast cell tumor proliferation panels”
on all biopsy specimens. The panel consists of a cell
proliferation analysis (PCNA, AgNOR, Ki-67), a c-kit PCR, and
KIT immunohistochemistry (IHC) to analyze the expression of this
tyrosine kinase receptor. Research indicates that a prognosis
developed from this combination of tests is highly correlated
with survival rates.
In determining the appropriate treatment for a
pet with mast cell tumor(s), we utilize a combination of the
histologic grade, proliferation panel, clinical history, size
and location of the tumor, to help give pet owners an
appropriate treatment course and prognosis.
Traditional histologic grading system for MCTs (Patnaik
grading criteria).
Left to right:
grade I (well-differentiated), grade II
(intermediately differentiated), grade III (poorly
differentiated
Previously, the histologic grade was the main
criteria we used in predicting a patient’s prognosis; however it
is not always accurate in predicting the outcome of an
individual patient’s case. Approximately 75% of all canine MCTs
fall into the category of grade II tumors. The biologic
behavior of tumors in this large group (Grade II) is noted to be
extremely variable. For this reason, in addition to histologic
grading, we also perform “mast cell tumor proliferation panels”
on all biopsy specimens. The panel consists of a cell
proliferation analysis (PCNA, AgNOR, Ki-67), a c-kit PCR, and
KIT immunohistochemistry (IHC) to analyze the expression of this
tyrosine kinase receptor. Research indicates that a prognosis
developed from this combination of tests is highly correlated
with survival rates.
In determining the appropriate treatment for a
pet with mast cell tumor(s), we utilize a combination of the
histologic grade, proliferation panel, clinical history, size
and location of the tumor, to help give pet owners an
appropriate treatment course and prognosis.
In addition to information regarding the grade
and proliferation panels, it is critical to know if the margins
of the tumor are contained within the surgical specimen, meaning
that the tumor in its entirety has been removed. Not only do we
need to know that the margins are tumor-free, but we need to
know how wide the tumor-free area is. Ideally, 5 mm margins
under the microscope should be present for adequate control of
localized disease.
KIT staining patterns for MCTs.
Upper left:
grade I;
upper right,
grade II;
lower left,
grade III;
lower right,
negative
control.
Courtesy of Dr. Matti Kuipel, MSU.
Staging the disease:
Once a mast cell
tumor is diagnosed, further tests are needed to determine if the
disease is localized or has spread. Generally, thoracic (chest)
radiographs, abdominal ultrasound, aspirates of any enlarged
lymph nodes, bone marrow aspirate (if extensive disease
suspected), CBC, chemistry panel, urinalysis, and buffy coat
analysis are tests that could potentially be needed. We will
discuss case specific issues with you to determine what staging
tests are appropriate.
TREATMENT OF MAST CELL TUMORS
Surgery:
Surgery is the
treatment of choice for the majority of mast cell tumors. An
attempt should be made to obtain tumor-free margins. Tumors
tend to spread their cells far beyond the visible limits of the
mass, therefore a large portion of normal appearing tissue
around the tumor must be removed. Typically, a 3 cm lateral
margin and one fascial plane below the tumor is required to
obtain microscopically tumor-free margins (see diagram below).
When the location precludes complete surgical excision,
radiation therapy is a very effective modality of treatment.
Wide and deep surgical borders are needed to
adequately excise mast cell tumors. A common mistake is to
“shell out” the tumor which invariably causes inadequate
excision of all microscopic malignant mast cells.
Radiation Therapy:
Radiation is
recommended for patients with inoperable tumors or for those
patients in which tumor-free margins could not be obtained
surgically. Recently published studies have indicated that the
recurrence rate of mast cell tumors removed surgically with
incomplete margins (tumor cells still present at the surgical
borders) has been under 20%. However, there is a risk of
waiting and allowing for possible regrowth as second tumors in
the site can increase in grade and aggressiveness.
The response to
radiation therapy for MCTs is excellent. Greater than 80% of
patients with grade II tumors treated with surgery and radiation
therapy were disease free 5 years later. Even in higher grade
tumors, local control can often be achieved.
Chemotherapy:
At the Animal
Cancer & Imaging Center we recommend chemotherapy for patients
with simultaneously occurring multiple tumors, histologically
high grade tumors, intermediate grade tumors with unfavorable
proliferation panels, or for patients with regional lymph node
involvement or systemic disease. We use a combination protocol
of lomustine (CCNU), Vinblastine, and prednisone. Newer
tyrosine kinase inhibitors are potentially beneficial for
patients with mast cell tumors and are sometimes recommended
when traditional chemotherapy or radiation therapy have proven
to be ineffective.
|